Skip to main content

Editor's Pick (ODI): India - South Africa

India completed the test series by winning the last and final match. Didn’t win the series yes, but made sure that the morale was boosted and that seemed like the takeaway for the men in blue.



The sensational fast bowling brought India to an excellent win. Taking 60 wickets in three matches is indeed more than just a record. It is something that truly lifts the spirits of the boys. Ishant Sharma and Jasprit Bumrah helped cause the dramatic collapse. "This is one of our sweetest wins," skipper Virat Kohli said. "This day will be remembered for a long time for us as a team."
The best part is that India now ranks number one in the ICC test ranking. We have overtaken South Africa. That is the icing on the cake. India is second on the ODI rankings too, with SA on top. Will we see that change too? Time will tell. The Virat Kohli led India can top the ODI table if they win the series by 4-2 or better, while to retain the top spot, South Africa will just have to draw the series. However, India will slip to third place if South Africa win five out of the six planned ODI.

With the ODI series starting on first Feb, the match could literally be in the hands of these fast bowlers; considering the pitch conditions. When picking a lineup for the first ODI, keep in the mind the pitch. Captain and Vice Captain too.

The match takes place at Kingsmead, Durban. The pitch has quite a green tinge to it. This ground has its highs and lows. It has seen a magnificent 658 in 2003. And also 66 all out in 1996. The 66 was by India. But ok. South African pitches are tricky. Tricky enough to cause the umpires to halt play. So the team’s composition

Let’s take a look at what could be a good lineup. Fast bowlers, fast bowlers and fast bowlers. Batsmen are likely to have a really hard time. Considering the performance of the Indians in the test series, we can predict how they might play in the upcoming ODI matches. 

Shikhar Dhawan was barely average. So was KL Rahul.  Rohit Sharma needs to scale up big time. Parthiv Patel lacks confidence and must buck up big time. Murali Vijay was just about alright. While Kohli stood out well in the badly performing batsmen list, Pujara managed to deliver to some extent. 

The ones that stood out were the bowlers - Bhuvneshwar Kumar, R Ashwin, Mohammed Shami, Jasprit Bumrah and Ishant Sharma. This should give you an idea about how the proportion in your lineup should look like.

My team
Wicket-keeper
Q de Kock
MS Dhoni
Bowlers
Morne Morkel
Jasprit Bumrah
K Rabada / Lungi Ngidi
M Shami
Batsmen
Hashim Amla
AB de Villiers
Faf du Plessis
Aiden Markram
All-Rounders
Kedar Jadhav / Hardik Paandya

What do you think?
Indu
P.S. Please note that the above-expressed opinions are purely the Editor’s. We do not take

responsibility, nor can we guarantee the performance of the players. All the best !!!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IPL 2014 - Mumbai Indians team analysis

The Mumbai Indians have always been the high-flying team of IPL.  They had the big buys in almost every year of IPL and kept a very high profile.  And over the last couple of years, they have started matching their performance with their profile – with wins in IPL 2013 and Champions League in 2011 and 2013.  Let us see how their team looks this year. Rohit Sharma, Mike Hussey, Ambati Rayudu and Apporv Wankhade are the pure play batsmen in the team. Corey Anderson, Keiron Pollard, Shreyas Gopal and Jalaj Saxena are the all rounders. CM Gautam, Ben Dunk, Sushant Marathe and Aditya Tare are the wicket keepers. Lasith Malinga, Zaheer Khan, Harbhajan Singh, Pragyan Ojha, Jasprit Bumrah, Josh Hazlewood, Marchant de Lange, Krishmar Santokie & Puwan Suyal are the bowlers.  The bowling looks pretty good with Malinga, Zaheer, Bajji and Ojha.   The batting is strong at the top – with Rohit Sharma and Mike Hussey, but looks weak beyond those two.   The power in the team comes from

Why do you run??

As the running season for the year 2013 begins, I wanted to share some of my thoughts on the subject. I am not a great runner.  Heck - I started running only a few years ago… well past my 35th birthday.  So this is not an attempt to guide or teach or inspire.  I don't have any specific objective in mind as I am writing this.  I am just sharing my thoughts on how I feel when I run long distance which others could possibly relate to. I have been running relatively long distances (5K, 10K and 21K) for a couple of years now. When I run a half marathon, I take longer than a seasoned runner.  A seasoned runner takes around 2 hours (And here I am excluding the seriously good runners who do it at a much more rapid pace) while I take 25 minutes longer.  But if you think about it… I am on my feet for that much longer.  So in that sense, taking longer to finish is better than finishing faster - right?  What do I think about when running…  Deep philosophy?  Something that has be
Growing up, we have been told repeatedly – winning is not as important as competing.   Events like the Olympics, with the famed Olympic spirit mantra, reinforce this message.  But how pragmatic is this notion of ‘competing’ as opposed to ‘winning’. Let us leave philosophy aside for a bit and look at this question from a purely commercial angle. Both Roger Federer and David Nalbandian have been in the professional tennis circuit for around the same amount of time.  Early evidence suggests that both of them were equally talented (with David winning almost all matches he played against Roger).  But over the years Roger has figured out how to win – not just against David but also against the other players.  As of now - Roger has taken home 8 times more money than Nalbandian has.  (73M Vs. 11 M).  Both are top-notch tennis players and yet, the difference is so stark. http://www.atpworldtour.com/Players/Head-To-Head.aspx?pId=F324&oId=N301 And this is just one part of the sto