Skip to main content

Editor’s Pick (ODI): England - West Indies

Despite the fact that it rained, the match had not lost its charm. The first ODI between England and West Indies was reduced to 42 overs per side because of the wet outfield. Yes this is also a reason for Duckworth and Lewis to make their entry into the scenario. West Indies not only lost the match by seven wickets, they lost their free ride to the World Cup in 2019. They have to fight it out to earn their place in the tournament by taking on Zimbabwe probably. They have to face the other ten teams who are aching to take part in the prestigious tournament. No one said it’s easy.
Sri Lanka was also watching this match with bathed breath hoping West Indies will lose. And they did lose, ensuring that Sri Lanka got in. This is the best news that Sri Lanka have received after being totally thrashed by India in their own home backyard. Yup they are relieved with this piece of news.

West Indies top order batsmen did not do too bad if you ask me. It just wasn’t enough. They brought 204 on the board at the end of 42 overs. England did better, that’s all. They reached the target in less than 31 overs. Jonny Bairstow hit his hundred and not without the drama. Joe Root gave him company with 54 runs off 53 deliveries. The West Indian Bowlers need to do better.
Today’s lineup
Bowlers
Devendra Bishoo
Liam Plunkett
KOK Williams
Adil Rashid
Batsmen
Joe Root
Alex Hales
Jonny Bairstow
Chris Gayle
All-Rounder
Ben Stokes
Jason Holder
Wicket-Keeper
Jos Buttler
What do you think? Chris Woakes and Shai Hope deserve a place too for sure. But who gets the kick?
Indu

P.S. Please note that the above-expressed opinions are purely the Editor’s. We do not take responsibility, nor can we guarantee the performance of the players. All the best !!!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why do you run??

As the running season for the year 2013 begins, I wanted to share some of my thoughts on the subject. I am not a great runner.  Heck - I started running only a few years ago… well past my 35th birthday.  So this is not an attempt to guide or teach or inspire.  I don't have any specific objective in mind as I am writing this.  I am just sharing my thoughts on how I feel when I run long distance which others could possibly relate to. I have been running relatively long distances (5K, 10K and 21K) for a couple of years now. When I run a half marathon, I take longer than a seasoned runner.  A seasoned runner takes around 2 hours (And here I am excluding the seriously good runners who do it at a much more rapid pace) while I take 25 minutes longer.  But if you think about it… I am on my feet for that much longer.  So in that sense, taking longer to finish is better than finishing faster - right?  What do I think about when running…  Deep philosophy?  Something that has be

IPL 2014 - Mumbai Indians team analysis

The Mumbai Indians have always been the high-flying team of IPL.  They had the big buys in almost every year of IPL and kept a very high profile.  And over the last couple of years, they have started matching their performance with their profile – with wins in IPL 2013 and Champions League in 2011 and 2013.  Let us see how their team looks this year. Rohit Sharma, Mike Hussey, Ambati Rayudu and Apporv Wankhade are the pure play batsmen in the team. Corey Anderson, Keiron Pollard, Shreyas Gopal and Jalaj Saxena are the all rounders. CM Gautam, Ben Dunk, Sushant Marathe and Aditya Tare are the wicket keepers. Lasith Malinga, Zaheer Khan, Harbhajan Singh, Pragyan Ojha, Jasprit Bumrah, Josh Hazlewood, Marchant de Lange, Krishmar Santokie & Puwan Suyal are the bowlers.  The bowling looks pretty good with Malinga, Zaheer, Bajji and Ojha.   The batting is strong at the top – with Rohit Sharma and Mike Hussey, but looks weak beyond those two.   The power in the team comes from
Growing up, we have been told repeatedly – winning is not as important as competing.   Events like the Olympics, with the famed Olympic spirit mantra, reinforce this message.  But how pragmatic is this notion of ‘competing’ as opposed to ‘winning’. Let us leave philosophy aside for a bit and look at this question from a purely commercial angle. Both Roger Federer and David Nalbandian have been in the professional tennis circuit for around the same amount of time.  Early evidence suggests that both of them were equally talented (with David winning almost all matches he played against Roger).  But over the years Roger has figured out how to win – not just against David but also against the other players.  As of now - Roger has taken home 8 times more money than Nalbandian has.  (73M Vs. 11 M).  Both are top-notch tennis players and yet, the difference is so stark. http://www.atpworldtour.com/Players/Head-To-Head.aspx?pId=F324&oId=N301 And this is just one part of the sto