Skip to main content

Women - Object of Respect, not Objectification

I had to visit the neurologist the other day. I call up the hospital and find out if one would be on call in the evening and had my appointment booked. Fifteen minutes before the scheduled appointment, I reach the receptionist to confirm the room. She goes, “ The lady neurologist will see you in room number 10”. I was stumped. What was the message she was trying to convey? Neurologist is in? She’s a lady? Do I want to see a lady neurologist?


It got me wondering. Does being a lady make her any less of a doctor? Why can’t the receptionist just say “ The neurologist is in?” And then I wondered .. does anyone ever say “lady receptionist”? No. Then why this tag for a doctor?
Women today are just being designated to posts where they can look pretty. Looking pretty seems more important than doing a good job. There are actresses who have confessed that they were told by the director to just look pretty and needn’t worry about acting. It is a pretty sad state of affairs when women are being looked at as women and not the role they play in their respective fields.
 
Take sports for example. When we watch Pete Sampras playing, we only see Pete Sampras. But somehow, in a very warped sense, a ladies’ match is seen as a lady playing, not a tennis player. In order to write a blog, I was looking up various write-ups on other achievers to note their accomplishments. It was really sad to see the snaps of some sportswomen. While the content claimed to be of their games, the snaps made it look like they were posing for an ad, not the game. The angles of the camera were all … I write wrong for lack of a better word.
But this is really really wrong. We should watch the game for the game, irrespective of which gender is playing it. The focus should be on the match, not to the fact that it was played by a lady. The moment the player is branded, the charm and the respect is lost. It is now a very sexist view. How can that view not be a biased one?
It is time to remove the gender completely. Lady doctor. Lady astronaut. Lady artist. Lady whatever. They are just doctors and engineers and people. It is really tragic that women represent half the human race and are still looked at as …. You complete it for me, please.

Indu

Comments

  1. Totally agree. And we see this all over the place. Just the other day, I saw a post about the "10 most glamorous sportswomen in India". Am I supposed to read the article because they are good sportswomen or because they are glamorous.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Spot on Indu. We really have to understand objectification. Most people I meet dont even see it as a problem which is shocking to say the least.

    ReplyDelete
  3. We all live in Hypocritical society for one side we talk of equality and on the other we talk of gender bias. You are correct in stating that there should not be an emphasis on " lady" doctor or engineer or for the matter any professional. Nice post

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IPL 2014 - Mumbai Indians team analysis

The Mumbai Indians have always been the high-flying team of IPL.  They had the big buys in almost every year of IPL and kept a very high profile.  And over the last couple of years, they have started matching their performance with their profile – with wins in IPL 2013 and Champions League in 2011 and 2013.  Let us see how their team looks this year. Rohit Sharma, Mike Hussey, Ambati Rayudu and Apporv Wankhade are the pure play batsmen in the team. Corey Anderson, Keiron Pollard, Shreyas Gopal and Jalaj Saxena are the all rounders. CM Gautam, Ben Dunk, Sushant Marathe and Aditya Tare are the wicket keepers. Lasith Malinga, Zaheer Khan, Harbhajan Singh, Pragyan Ojha, Jasprit Bumrah, Josh Hazlewood, Marchant de Lange, Krishmar Santokie & Puwan Suyal are the bowlers.  The bowling looks pretty good with Malinga, Zaheer, Bajji and Ojha.   The batting is strong at the top – with Rohit Sharma and Mike Hussey, but looks weak beyond those two.   The power in the team comes from

Why do you run??

As the running season for the year 2013 begins, I wanted to share some of my thoughts on the subject. I am not a great runner.  Heck - I started running only a few years ago… well past my 35th birthday.  So this is not an attempt to guide or teach or inspire.  I don't have any specific objective in mind as I am writing this.  I am just sharing my thoughts on how I feel when I run long distance which others could possibly relate to. I have been running relatively long distances (5K, 10K and 21K) for a couple of years now. When I run a half marathon, I take longer than a seasoned runner.  A seasoned runner takes around 2 hours (And here I am excluding the seriously good runners who do it at a much more rapid pace) while I take 25 minutes longer.  But if you think about it… I am on my feet for that much longer.  So in that sense, taking longer to finish is better than finishing faster - right?  What do I think about when running…  Deep philosophy?  Something that has be
Growing up, we have been told repeatedly – winning is not as important as competing.   Events like the Olympics, with the famed Olympic spirit mantra, reinforce this message.  But how pragmatic is this notion of ‘competing’ as opposed to ‘winning’. Let us leave philosophy aside for a bit and look at this question from a purely commercial angle. Both Roger Federer and David Nalbandian have been in the professional tennis circuit for around the same amount of time.  Early evidence suggests that both of them were equally talented (with David winning almost all matches he played against Roger).  But over the years Roger has figured out how to win – not just against David but also against the other players.  As of now - Roger has taken home 8 times more money than Nalbandian has.  (73M Vs. 11 M).  Both are top-notch tennis players and yet, the difference is so stark. http://www.atpworldtour.com/Players/Head-To-Head.aspx?pId=F324&oId=N301 And this is just one part of the sto