Skip to main content

Editor's take: Pakistan - Sri Lanka

Catches win matches. Dropped catches and overthrows that reach the boundary? That’s handing over the match to the opponent on a silver platter. More than enough misfielding. 23 extras. This was one of the most important matches for Sri Lanka. And they did mess up. The pain on L Malinga’s face was truly tangible.

But not to take the credit away from Pakistan. They played a very good match. They did have their share of mistakes, yes. But the mistakes of Sri Lanka were more expensive. Leading to Pakistan winning by 3 wickets and joining the other three teams - India, Bangladesh, and England - in the Semi-Finals of the ICC Championships 2017.
What happened to Sri Lanka? This is what Ravi Shastri asks, appalled. This is not how one plays in an important tournament as this. Sri Lanka did put on an amateur show. No, I am not being too critical. It was rather embarrassing. Fielding, once a strong suit, has now become a reason for their loss.
Sarfaraz played a captain’s innings. This knock has made all the difference to the team. When Pakistan walked in to chase, the total of 236 was good, not impossible. The first wicket fell at 74 with opening batsmen, Ali hitting 34 and Zaman, 50. Once the first wicket fell, the other six seemed to fall rather quickly. Five wickets fell in a span of 45 runs. They truly seemed to be running out of wickets. They had a ton of overs left. That was the cushion they were leaning on, I guess. And then Sarfaraz found his mojo. 61 of 79 deliveries, the captain led the team from the front along with Mohammad Amir. The partnership of 75 took them home.
Earlier in the day, Pakistan won the toss and sent Sri Lanka in. Only Niroshan Dickwella (73) hit more than half-century. The rest fell to small numbers. There was nothing outstanding about the batting. The target was not un-defendable. Sri Lanka lost the plot with the dropped catches and the misfielding.
The relief on their faces of the Pakistan players and the fans was simply overflowing. It was not just joy and excitement. And they deserve to celebrate. They held their nerves when under pressure. Quite rare, especially after a mid-innings collapse. This is a historic win for them. Whatever happens henceforth, this match will be a good one to remember for years to come.
So what next? Pakistan meet England, and India meet Bangladesh. No one could have predicted these four teams in the semis. This is cricket for you. Unpredictable.

Indu


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IPL 2014 - Mumbai Indians team analysis

The Mumbai Indians have always been the high-flying team of IPL.  They had the big buys in almost every year of IPL and kept a very high profile.  And over the last couple of years, they have started matching their performance with their profile – with wins in IPL 2013 and Champions League in 2011 and 2013.  Let us see how their team looks this year. Rohit Sharma, Mike Hussey, Ambati Rayudu and Apporv Wankhade are the pure play batsmen in the team. Corey Anderson, Keiron Pollard, Shreyas Gopal and Jalaj Saxena are the all rounders. CM Gautam, Ben Dunk, Sushant Marathe and Aditya Tare are the wicket keepers. Lasith Malinga, Zaheer Khan, Harbhajan Singh, Pragyan Ojha, Jasprit Bumrah, Josh Hazlewood, Marchant de Lange, Krishmar Santokie & Puwan Suyal are the bowlers.  The bowling looks pretty good with Malinga, Zaheer, Bajji and Ojha.   The batting is strong at the top – with Rohit Sharma and Mike Hussey, but looks weak beyond those two.   The power in the team comes from

Why do you run??

As the running season for the year 2013 begins, I wanted to share some of my thoughts on the subject. I am not a great runner.  Heck - I started running only a few years ago… well past my 35th birthday.  So this is not an attempt to guide or teach or inspire.  I don't have any specific objective in mind as I am writing this.  I am just sharing my thoughts on how I feel when I run long distance which others could possibly relate to. I have been running relatively long distances (5K, 10K and 21K) for a couple of years now. When I run a half marathon, I take longer than a seasoned runner.  A seasoned runner takes around 2 hours (And here I am excluding the seriously good runners who do it at a much more rapid pace) while I take 25 minutes longer.  But if you think about it… I am on my feet for that much longer.  So in that sense, taking longer to finish is better than finishing faster - right?  What do I think about when running…  Deep philosophy?  Something that has be
Growing up, we have been told repeatedly – winning is not as important as competing.   Events like the Olympics, with the famed Olympic spirit mantra, reinforce this message.  But how pragmatic is this notion of ‘competing’ as opposed to ‘winning’. Let us leave philosophy aside for a bit and look at this question from a purely commercial angle. Both Roger Federer and David Nalbandian have been in the professional tennis circuit for around the same amount of time.  Early evidence suggests that both of them were equally talented (with David winning almost all matches he played against Roger).  But over the years Roger has figured out how to win – not just against David but also against the other players.  As of now - Roger has taken home 8 times more money than Nalbandian has.  (73M Vs. 11 M).  Both are top-notch tennis players and yet, the difference is so stark. http://www.atpworldtour.com/Players/Head-To-Head.aspx?pId=F324&oId=N301 And this is just one part of the sto