Skip to main content

Editor’s Take: India - South Africa

It was a beautiful day. The combination of the blue and the green in the atmosphere was simply brilliant. The light sky blue. The sea of blue in the audience. The luscious green grass. It was beautiful.
I know. I know. This is not a poetry. This is supposed to be a blog on cricket. But I just can’t help myself. Finally, no rains. That has to be appreciated, yes? It was a very nice day for cricket. Not really, when it comes to the number of runs on the board. But, it was a good day.
So here’s what happened. India won the toss and sent the Proteas to bat. A pretty good decision. Another good call - Bringing in R Ashwin to the team. The word out there is that India Decimate South Africa to reserve a berth in the semi-finals. The South African really looked out of sorts. India won. By Eight Wickets. And 72 balls to spare.
When India walked in, they had a target of 192. The openers began their innings with a maiden over and then unleashed their batting prowess on the already shattered South Africans. Shikhar Dhawan’s 78 along with Virat Kohli’s 76 was more than enough to storm their team into the semi-finals of the ICC Championship Trophy 2017. And all this happened at the Oval. The knock knocked South Africa out of the tournament.
It was a pity that Dhawan missed his century. But he did manage to make himself the leading run-scorer in the tournament so far.
Earlier in the day, when the South Africans came into bat, the sun was shining and it looked wonderful. ( yes I’m done with nature talk). The atmosphere was intense. From the very beginning, it looked like the batsmen were under pressure. The run rate hovered between three and four. This by itself looked rather dismal from the Proteas point of view. And then the wickets began to tumble. Literally. Now it’s very easy to sit in front of the television set and comment about how they buckled under pressure. They were under tremendous pressure, without a doubt. How else can you explain three run-outs?
Their first wicket fell when they had scored 76 runs. Though the run rate was low, Quinton De Kock had scored 53 and Amla, 35. By the time the last wicket well, there were only 191 runs on the board. That’s ten wickets in a span of 115 runs. The number of dot balls was so high, the batsmen were forced to scramble for the ones and the twos. A couple of bad calls, some excellent fielding by the Indians and wickets fell.
Full credit to the Indian bowlers as well. The fiasco against Sri Lanka may now be forgiven and forgotten. They did very well to restrict the South Africans to a dismal score in what could have been a close match.
End of the day, despite it being a very one-sided match, the army of Indian Fans walked out of the Oval Happy and thrilled. Everything clicked for the Indians.
Indu



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IPL 2014 - Mumbai Indians team analysis

The Mumbai Indians have always been the high-flying team of IPL.  They had the big buys in almost every year of IPL and kept a very high profile.  And over the last couple of years, they have started matching their performance with their profile – with wins in IPL 2013 and Champions League in 2011 and 2013.  Let us see how their team looks this year. Rohit Sharma, Mike Hussey, Ambati Rayudu and Apporv Wankhade are the pure play batsmen in the team. Corey Anderson, Keiron Pollard, Shreyas Gopal and Jalaj Saxena are the all rounders. CM Gautam, Ben Dunk, Sushant Marathe and Aditya Tare are the wicket keepers. Lasith Malinga, Zaheer Khan, Harbhajan Singh, Pragyan Ojha, Jasprit Bumrah, Josh Hazlewood, Marchant de Lange, Krishmar Santokie & Puwan Suyal are the bowlers.  The bowling looks pretty good with Malinga, Zaheer, Bajji and Ojha.   The batting is strong at the top – with Rohit Sharma and Mike Hussey, but looks weak beyond those two.   The power in the team comes from

Why do you run??

As the running season for the year 2013 begins, I wanted to share some of my thoughts on the subject. I am not a great runner.  Heck - I started running only a few years ago… well past my 35th birthday.  So this is not an attempt to guide or teach or inspire.  I don't have any specific objective in mind as I am writing this.  I am just sharing my thoughts on how I feel when I run long distance which others could possibly relate to. I have been running relatively long distances (5K, 10K and 21K) for a couple of years now. When I run a half marathon, I take longer than a seasoned runner.  A seasoned runner takes around 2 hours (And here I am excluding the seriously good runners who do it at a much more rapid pace) while I take 25 minutes longer.  But if you think about it… I am on my feet for that much longer.  So in that sense, taking longer to finish is better than finishing faster - right?  What do I think about when running…  Deep philosophy?  Something that has be
Growing up, we have been told repeatedly – winning is not as important as competing.   Events like the Olympics, with the famed Olympic spirit mantra, reinforce this message.  But how pragmatic is this notion of ‘competing’ as opposed to ‘winning’. Let us leave philosophy aside for a bit and look at this question from a purely commercial angle. Both Roger Federer and David Nalbandian have been in the professional tennis circuit for around the same amount of time.  Early evidence suggests that both of them were equally talented (with David winning almost all matches he played against Roger).  But over the years Roger has figured out how to win – not just against David but also against the other players.  As of now - Roger has taken home 8 times more money than Nalbandian has.  (73M Vs. 11 M).  Both are top-notch tennis players and yet, the difference is so stark. http://www.atpworldtour.com/Players/Head-To-Head.aspx?pId=F324&oId=N301 And this is just one part of the sto