Skip to main content

Bring back the low scoring games

We are 4 matches into the one day series between India and Australia and the scores of the batting teams read thus - 304,232,359,362,303,304,295……  What is the right word to describe this - “ridiculous" comes close.

I remember the time, not too long ago, when a score of around 220 or 225 was considered an acceptable score in a 50 over game.   Today, we find that teams get to 220 in around the 40th over of the innings.   There are many things contributing to this kind of a change, and I think better batsmanship is only a small reason.
1.  The bats are incredibly big and powerful these days.  Recently I played a serious cricket match after around 10 good years.  I was stunned to see batsmen hit big sixes (even in the local cricket level) with great ease.  Even mishits were going for sixes.  And I am not talking about the most expensive bats out there.  I can only imagine how good the top quality bats are.  Put a bat like that in the hands of someone like a Chris Gayle - and what do you expect as a result?
2.  Over the years, bowlers painstakingly figured out ways to win back some pride in the limited overs game.  The shorter formats can be credited with introducing incredibly good balls that are bowled today - yorkers, slow bouncers, doosras, etc. But recently, there have been some rule changes that have been dumbfounding.   First was the rule that said that bowlers bowl with a new ball from both ends of the wicket - essentially meaning that the oldest a ball gets in a match is 25 overs old.  A ball that new is very hard to grip for the spinners and the ball just does not spin when it is that new.   Also, fast bowlers learnt to reverse swing the ball only after the ball was 45 to 50 overs old.   With the new rule, we have taken both spin bowling and reverse swing bowling out of the equation.
3.  Rules like 1 bouncer an over, fielding restrictions, power plays, etc only tilt the game further in favour of the batsmen.

The justification given for all of these rule changes is that fans like high scoring games and love to see 4s and 6s.  I can categorically say that this is not true.  A true cricket fan wants cricket to be a battle between the bat and the ball.  These rule changes are responsible for making one day cricket predictable and boring.  One should not blame T20 for the demise of One day cricket.  We should blame our administrators.  
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chennai beats Mumbai and clinch thriller

It is not just about coming back. It is about the impact you make in the process. And Chennai team knows how to with a bang.  The Chennai team beat the home team by one wicket in what was an absolute sit-at-the-end-of-the-chair thriller. It was one of the best chases the tournament has seen and it most definitely won't be the last. The player who made the difference in the end - Jadhav - literally came back from the dead after retiring hurt to take his team to the finish line by hitting the ball in style with a six and a four.  Batting on one leg and playing an absolutely unbelievable shot, this player leveled the scores first with a six and finished the match with a four.  Key Points  MI has never won their opener since 2013. This was Chennai's first win against MI in an opener of this T20 League  DRS used in the league for the first time  Bravo : It was a great team effort. I want to dedicate this win to the CSK fan, they have waited long for

Fan Data Analytics: Key to drive sports company growth

Over the last several years, the buzz word in business and IT circles has been "big-data" and analytics. Many many articles and write-ups talk about them so I won't go into the details. You could get enough to last a lifetime with just the first few results of a Google search of these terms. But do you really know how it applies, specifically to a sports company? For long, sports franchises have been one of the biggest users of analytics. Before this was a buzz word, coaches and managers have relied up numbers and finding patterns in them to drive on-field performance. Indeed, the major leagues of the world have relied on performance analytics for everything from scouting for talent to calling the action on the field of play. But that never transcended to the off-field, more mundane but equally important task of managing the sports business. As more and more options come up vying for the fan's attention - live events, travel, other sports, TV, the Internet - the

Blog Time: How I won my Fantain Fantasy Cricket

I played the Sri Lanka – Zimbabwe match and I won more than six times what I put in. That is a really good investment, isn’t it? I have been asked by Fantain to share what I did and how I planned my lineup. This is how. Kusal Perera  – I made him captain. I won a massive 120 points. My vice-captain was Dinesh Chandimal .  So I got 43.5. In hindsight, I could have picked Perera. He did fabulously well and earned a whopping 89 on the app. The other player in my lineup who helped me win was Sikandar Raza . He got 88.5 on the app. These four players are a must be in the next match between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe.  Dinesh Chandimal is one good consistent player that I always have. So it’s like this. I have four categories when I play fantasy cricket. One is the must-have players who will be on my team no matter what. For this match that I played, they were Kusal Perera, Dinesh Chandimal, and Upul Tharanga. For me, old is gold. Experience speaks volumes. The second category is ba